RAD140 and LGD4033 are two extremely popular SARMs, especially when talking about bulking cycles. These are often the first options that most people look into when it comes to packing on muscle mass and gaining strength. Both of these SARMs are very popular and very effective and both deserve respect.
However, that’s pretty much everything that a lot of people know about them without knowing the actual differences and similarities between the two. It’s very important to understand though that SARMs are working differently for different people. For this reason, without actually giving each one of them a try, you wouldn’t have a full understanding of how they may work specifically for you.
Anyhow, I have had the honor to use both of them. That’s why I’m going to explain, the best way I can, the differences between these two SARMs. But please remember that this is just my personal experience so it could be somewhat different for you. I’m going to share here their positive and negative sides. In short, a side by side comparison of RAD140 (Testolone) vs LGD4033 (Ligandrol).
Before we continue, let’s take a closer look at each one of them.
RAD 140 Testolone
RAD 140, often popular by the name Testolone, is a SARM that offers one of the best anabolic to androgenic ratios of 90:1.
According to both research as well as anecdotal reports from people with actual experience with RAD 140 SARM (Testolone) – this compound can produce amazing results. Even at a low RAD140 dosage.
Many people consider RAD 140 a SARM that is capable of increasing lean muscle mass and strength without a “bloating” appearance.
Check more helpful information about RAD140 (Testolone) here.
LGD 4033 Ligandrol
On the other hand, we have LGD 4033, popular by the name Ligandrol, which is also a SARM that is popular for being a full agonist of the androgen receptor.
According to anecdotal reports, this product is very suppressive to natural testosterone production, and this is one of the main reasons why it’s very important to be careful when it comes to choosing the right Ligandrol dosage.
Just like RAD 140, LGD 4033 has proven itself highly effective even in low dosages for the purpose of gaining muscle and strength. According to phase II trials that Ligandrol achieved, this SARM is well tolerated even in human subjects even in higher dosages.
Overall, LGD4033 has some really promising results. Check some more helpful information about LGD4033 (Ligandrol) here.
RAD 140 vs LGD 4033 Half-Life
Whenever you want to administer a compound, it’s very important to learn about its half-life. This way you would learn the best way to administer it in order to yield the best results.
- So, research indicates that RAD 140 is having an unusually long half-life for an oral product of up to sixty (60) hours!
- On the other hand, LGD 4033 half-life is anywhere between 24 to 36 hours. While it’s shorter, it’s still very long.
Because of this, you will need to administer whatever of these two SARMs once a day while on the cycle. Regardless of the daily dosage, using it all at once a day, every day at approximately the same time of the day is the best way to use them.
RAD140 vs LGD4033 Benefits
Both of these SARMs are very popular due to the fact that they offer awesome benefits. Additionally, both are offering similar benefits. Nonetheless, they are still different. So, I’m going to talk about their benefits and the difference in potency between them.
Muscle Mass Growth
While on a Ligandrol cycle, I managed to gain around 3-4 more pounds of muscle mass than on the Testolone cycle. Nonetheless, the gains I managed to yield from the Testolone cycle were leaner.
So if you want a drier look then RAD 140 seems like a better option. But if you want to grow as big as possible then LGD 4033 seems like a better option.
Strength Increase
Although I gained more on Ligandrol, I was more powerful on Testolone. That’s why I think that RAD 140 is a winner here. The strength increase on LGD 4033 was also amazing. On both, I got insane strength and huge pumps.
Nonetheless, I was still doing better in the strength department with RAD140.
Stamina and Endurance
Stamina is another thing that I was paying attention to and I noticed that Ligandrol takes the lead here. I was performing better in terms of strength with RAD 140, but I was noticing much better stamina and endurance with LGD 4033 in the gym.
Again, Testolone was also offering this effect, no doubt, but not as pronounced as with Ligandrol.
Motivation
While I was running RAD 140 I was definitely more motivated. Then again, Ligandrol was increasing my motivation and the “aggression” I needed in the gym, but RAD 140 seemed to do it much better. Thanks to this motivation and strength, I was always thinking about going to the gym and always wanted to lift more and more.
By the way, I also always wanted to break new personal records on it too. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why I was so motivated to keep lifting and training more and more.
Recovery Boost
Yet, another point that I give to Ligandrol LGD4033. Both improved my recovery times, but recovery times on Ligandrol were much shorter, to be honest. During those cycles, I was going to the gym 6 times a week and I always felt that I was fully recovered on Ligandrol, but not always on Testolone.
I was feeling more rested in the morning with both of them, but I was feeling like a million bucks in the morning with Ligandrol, yet, again, not always with Testolone.
Fat Loss and Vascularity
My body was way more vascular while I was on RAD 140 rather than on LGD 4033. Part of the reason could be because I gained more weight on LGD 4033 and part of that weight was water retention. So, RAD 140 is definitely a winner here. I was losing fat more efficiently on Testolone rather than on Ligandrol, that’s for sure.
I managed to strip off fat with the help of both these SARMs, but I stripped off more on RAD140 rather than LGD4033. Taking both these factors into consideration, it’s obvious that vascularity was more pronounced on RAD140.
This is why I consider that RAD140, for example, is much better for those who want to look dry, shredded, and lean. But LGD4033 is much better for those people who want to look as big as possible.
Testolone vs Ligandrol Results
So, as a result, you need to take into consideration your goals before deciding which one to choose. Moreover, as I said, remember that they could work somewhat differently for different people. I would say that it’s best to experiment with both before making a conclusion.
Nevertheless, for me (and it seems that for the majority of people who experimented with both of them), Ligandrol is a better option for gaining and building muscle mass and feeling better while Testolone is a winner for getting stronger and leaner muscle and looking shredded.
RAD 140 is offering more power and better pumps, making you lose fat and appear drier.
LGD 4033, however, lowers recovery time and enhances your stamina and endurance!
So, as you can notice, each one of them is performing somewhat better than the other in specific departments. That’s why it’s really difficult to say which one is a complete winner. Perhaps there isn’t one.
There might be one better than the other for specific goals and/or for specific people though.
Moreover, remember that each one of them comes with its own disadvantages too. Let’s take a look.
RAD 140 vs LGD 4033 Side Effects
Side effects are another thing that you should consider when deciding which one to choose. Again, they may affect you in different ways than these SARMs affected me. It comes down to genetics, dosage, and so on and so forth. I personally experienced some side effects but none of them were too nasty, to be honest.
Either it’s because I’m a lucky one, or I was paying attention to using them correctly to keep them under control, or maybe a combination of both – I’m not sure. Whatever the case – I recommend you to be careful with them.
Testosterone Suppression
A lot of people are wondering about the suppression rates between these two SARMs. Many want to know which one is more suppressive. This is one of the very first things that people usually ask me.
So well, I was feeling a mild suppression while running Ligandrol at a dosage of only 2.5 mg a day. Although this dosage was low (I later increased the dosage which definitely resulted in way more suppression), I could feel a mild suppression. But due to the low dosage, I didn’t require a harsh PCT. Toward the end of the cycle, I could feel lethargy and low motivation with lower libido.
I started my first Testolone cycle on a much higher dosage of 10 mg per day and it’s obvious that Testolone suppressed me more than 2.5 mg a day of Ligandrol.
Nonetheless, the suppression was pretty bad. I had a pretty harsh PCT for RAD 140. But then later, when I increased the dosage of Ligandrol, I required an even harsher PCT for LGD 4033.
So, in the end, personally for me, when checking them side by side, I do think that LGD 4033 is more suppressive than RAD 140. While it’s not a really HUGE difference, there is still some.
Aggression
Remember I earlier said that RAD 140 was a better motivator than LGD 4033 with more aggression in the gym? Well, it was actually increasing aggression too much from time to time. I could feel that I was more easily irritable on a RAD 140 cycle rather than an LGD 4033 cycle.
Occasionally, even some very little things were bothering me. It’s not to say that I was absolutely calm on Ligandrol, but I was definitely having more “anger issues” on Testolone.
Joint Pain
Another “bigger” disadvantage of Testolone in comparison to Ligandrol is joint pain. That’s because while I wasn’t having any issues with LGD 4033 with my joints, I could feel my joints starting to hurt on RAD 140, especially at the end of the cycle.
I feel that it could be because I was breaking more personal records on RAD140 and because I was having more water retention on LGD4033. Water is very important for maintaining healthy joints. With this being said, let’s move to the next side effect.
Water Retention
While I can’t say that I was retaining water on LGD4033 (generally), I definitely retained somewhat more water on it than on RAD140.
I wasn’t looking bloated or puffy on Ligandrol, but then again, as I earlier said, on RAD140 I was definitely leaner and more shredded.
Other Side Effects
Except for these side effects, I didn’t feel any other issues while I was on these two SARMs. HOWEVER, it’s important to remember that there are others. According to reports I see online, some people report oily skin or even acne. Others say that they notice hair loss. These are side effects that are very closely related to your genetics.
I’m one of the lucky ones without genetics to lose hair or suffer from acne. My father is 65 and his head is full of hair. At the same time, I never once in my life suffered from acne. These are not bulletproof indicators, but they are still somewhat good indicators that I’m not prone to such issues genetically. That’s why I haven’t ever suffered from these issues.
There may be other side effects too.
But it’s very important that some people do not use real SARMs (or abuse them) and they report absurd side effects. It’s important to buy quality SARMs to stay away from side effects and to use those quality SARMs correctly too!
RAD 140 VS LGD 4033 Prices
In terms of prices, there is not a huge difference. It truly depends on the brand that you choose because there are some more pricey than others. There are some brands that offer RAD 140 for a higher price than LGD 4033, but other manufacturers have a bigger price for LGD 4033 than RAD 140 (mg per mg).
But considering that the common daily dosage is usually lower LGD 4033 than RAD 140, it seems like LGD 4033 is somewhat slightly cheaper.
Yet, remember that at SARMS.to you can find the best quality SARMs (produced only by trustworthy manufacturers) for the best prices.
VS
Conclusion
In the end, both these SARMs are very popular and highly effective. As long as you use quality SARMs properly, they are going to do their job as expected.
Remember that if you’re searching for more muscle mass, overall weight gain and decreased recovery times – Ligandrol (LGD 4033) is a better option.
But on the flip side, if you want to look shredded, with lower body fat and overall increased vascularity – Testolone (RAD 140) is a better option.
You need to learn how to use them correctly. Moreover, in order to decide which is actually a better option, it’s best to use them both and see which one is actually greater.
In the end, there are some people with more experience who stack both of these SARMs together for even better results! Whatever you choose – good luck and be careful! 
